<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Digg and Reddit are Doomed (and Metafilter Isn&#8217;t)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.crankingwidgets.com/2007/10/30/digg-and-reddit-are-doomed-but-not-metafilter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.crankingwidgets.com/2007/10/30/digg-and-reddit-are-doomed-but-not-metafilter/</link>
	<description>Productivity for Entrepreneurs, GTD</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:03:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Interesting thought&#8230; &#124; Oracle</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankingwidgets.com/2007/10/30/digg-and-reddit-are-doomed-but-not-metafilter/comment-page-1/#comment-23277</link>
		<dc:creator>Interesting thought&#8230; &#124; Oracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankingwidgets.com/2007/10/30/digg-and-reddit-are-doomed-but-not-metafilter/#comment-23277</guid>
		<description>[...] read this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmy s</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankingwidgets.com/2007/10/30/digg-and-reddit-are-doomed-but-not-metafilter/comment-page-1/#comment-22802</link>
		<dc:creator>jimmy s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankingwidgets.com/2007/10/30/digg-and-reddit-are-doomed-but-not-metafilter/#comment-22802</guid>
		<description>i use the service ://URLFAN and their Buzz Radar which to me is more transparent in regards to whats going on the blogosphere&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urlfan.com/site/buzz_100/600.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.urlfan.com/site/buzz_100/600.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;urlfan crunches all the data from over a couple million rss feeds and tracks what&#039;s moving in the blogosphere.  there&#039;s no human intervention so it&#039;s able to float top stories faster than the standard vote up/down digg and reddit use.  according to alexa, urlfan is about to overtake reddit in terms of reach and rank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i use the service ://URLFAN and their Buzz Radar which to me is more transparent in regards to whats going on the blogosphere</p>
<p><a href="http://www.urlfan.com/site/buzz_100/600.html">http://www.urlfan.com/site/buzz_100/600.html</a></p>
<p>urlfan crunches all the data from over a couple million rss feeds and tracks what&#39;s moving in the blogosphere.  there&#39;s no human intervention so it&#39;s able to float top stories faster than the standard vote up/down digg and reddit use.  according to alexa, urlfan is about to overtake reddit in terms of reach and rank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alpha Kilo Hotel</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankingwidgets.com/2007/10/30/digg-and-reddit-are-doomed-but-not-metafilter/comment-page-1/#comment-21822</link>
		<dc:creator>Alpha Kilo Hotel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 18:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankingwidgets.com/2007/10/30/digg-and-reddit-are-doomed-but-not-metafilter/#comment-21822</guid>
		<description>[...] charges a one-time fee of $5 to actively participate on it&#8217;s website. Now, this idea isn&#8217;t exactly original, but I believe in can simplify Mr. Kelly&#8217;s theory a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] charges a one-time fee of $5 to actively participate on it&#8217;s website. Now, this idea isn&#8217;t exactly original, but I believe in can simplify Mr. Kelly&#8217;s theory a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: desjardins</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankingwidgets.com/2007/10/30/digg-and-reddit-are-doomed-but-not-metafilter/comment-page-1/#comment-21586</link>
		<dc:creator>desjardins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 20:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankingwidgets.com/2007/10/30/digg-and-reddit-are-doomed-but-not-metafilter/#comment-21586</guid>
		<description>Angela, what are you talking about? To create a link in a Metafilter comment or post, you type the text (e.g., Here is a picture of penguins), click on the &quot;link&quot; button to the bottom right of the comment box, and paste the URL. Or you can use regular old HTML, i.e. &lt;a href=&quot;www.google.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angela, what are you talking about? To create a link in a Metafilter comment or post, you type the text (e.g., Here is a picture of penguins), click on the &#8220;link&#8221; button to the bottom right of the comment box, and paste the URL. Or you can use regular old HTML, i.e. <a href="www.google.com">Google</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rattata</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankingwidgets.com/2007/10/30/digg-and-reddit-are-doomed-but-not-metafilter/comment-page-1/#comment-21572</link>
		<dc:creator>rattata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 05:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankingwidgets.com/2007/10/30/digg-and-reddit-are-doomed-but-not-metafilter/#comment-21572</guid>
		<description>Yes. That linking system did require conscious thought to understand. Intuitiveness and simplicity is really the best thing for websites.

Most of the links i saw on the front page that interested me were links that I&#039;d already read that day on reddit.

I don&#039;t think theres any answer to creating an idiotproof website. When something becomes widely trafficked, the culture gets diluted and what it originally was is lost. You can&#039;t change that. 

All you can do is hone your early adopter skills to always be on the lookout for the new stuff that hasn&#039;t been discovered yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. That linking system did require conscious thought to understand. Intuitiveness and simplicity is really the best thing for websites.</p>
<p>Most of the links i saw on the front page that interested me were links that I&#8217;d already read that day on reddit.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think theres any answer to creating an idiotproof website. When something becomes widely trafficked, the culture gets diluted and what it originally was is lost. You can&#8217;t change that. </p>
<p>All you can do is hone your early adopter skills to always be on the lookout for the new stuff that hasn&#8217;t been discovered yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela Whanksbury</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankingwidgets.com/2007/10/30/digg-and-reddit-are-doomed-but-not-metafilter/comment-page-1/#comment-21571</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela Whanksbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankingwidgets.com/2007/10/30/digg-and-reddit-are-doomed-but-not-metafilter/#comment-21571</guid>
		<description>Now if only MetaFilter didn&#039;t use the pain in the butt linking system they do. [This link](http://example.net/)is an [example](http://example.net/) of [what](http://example.net/) [I](http://example.net/) [mean](http://example.net/).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now if only MetaFilter didn&#8217;t use the pain in the butt linking system they do. [This link](http://example.net/)is an [example](http://example.net/) of [what](http://example.net/) [I](http://example.net/) [mean](http://example.net/).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Adam</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankingwidgets.com/2007/10/30/digg-and-reddit-are-doomed-but-not-metafilter/comment-page-1/#comment-21569</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankingwidgets.com/2007/10/30/digg-and-reddit-are-doomed-but-not-metafilter/#comment-21569</guid>
		<description>I think Non-fan pretty much unknowingly proved your entire point. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Non-fan pretty much unknowingly proved your entire point. <img src='http://blog.crankingwidgets.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bithead</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankingwidgets.com/2007/10/30/digg-and-reddit-are-doomed-but-not-metafilter/comment-page-1/#comment-21568</link>
		<dc:creator>bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankingwidgets.com/2007/10/30/digg-and-reddit-are-doomed-but-not-metafilter/#comment-21568</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure that the metafilter comments and submissions are any better than those at reddit.  Its layout isn&#039;t as clean as reddit&#039;s is, however.  It comes across as cluttered, and submissions end being short articles themselves, and not very well put together for the most part.

Nominal subscription fees aren&#039;t a bad idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that the metafilter comments and submissions are any better than those at reddit.  Its layout isn&#8217;t as clean as reddit&#8217;s is, however.  It comes across as cluttered, and submissions end being short articles themselves, and not very well put together for the most part.</p>
<p>Nominal subscription fees aren&#8217;t a bad idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDW</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankingwidgets.com/2007/10/30/digg-and-reddit-are-doomed-but-not-metafilter/comment-page-1/#comment-16870</link>
		<dc:creator>JDW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankingwidgets.com/2007/10/30/digg-and-reddit-are-doomed-but-not-metafilter/#comment-16870</guid>
		<description>Digg, Wikipedia, Reddit, and a lot more sites, are just full of self-important 12 year olds who want praise for their ability to string together combos of Google searches and paste what they find into a text editor. Who the hell would waste their time on a site like that instead of, I don&#039;t know, something productive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digg, Wikipedia, Reddit, and a lot more sites, are just full of self-important 12 year olds who want praise for their ability to string together combos of Google searches and paste what they find into a text editor. Who the hell would waste their time on a site like that instead of, I don&#8217;t know, something productive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul l mccord jr &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why I Do Not Use Digg.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankingwidgets.com/2007/10/30/digg-and-reddit-are-doomed-but-not-metafilter/comment-page-1/#comment-16577</link>
		<dc:creator>paul l mccord jr &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why I Do Not Use Digg.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 20:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankingwidgets.com/2007/10/30/digg-and-reddit-are-doomed-but-not-metafilter/#comment-16577</guid>
		<description>[...] ran across a post on Brett Kelly&#8217;s blog about why he feels that Digg.com and Reddit will fail.&#xA0; It is an opinion piece about the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ran across a post on Brett Kelly&#8217;s blog about why he feels that Digg.com and Reddit will fail.&#xA0; It is an opinion piece about the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
